2 min readfrom Frontiers in Marine Science | New and Recent Articles

Channel-scale tidal currents from vessel-mounted ADCP in three navigation channels of the Colombian Pacific: phase-dependent vertical structure and its dissociation from stratification

Our take

Characterizing channel-scale tidal currents is crucial for safe navigation and coastal management. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of three Colombian Pacific bays—Tumaco, Buenaventura, and Málaga—utilizing 1.48 million ADCP profiles collected between 2020 and 2024. Findings reveal distinct phase-dependent vertical structures, with Buenaventura and Málaga exhibiting a notable ebb dominance compared to Tumaco. Notably, stratification alone doesn’t fully explain these differences, suggesting channel geometry and friction play a significant role.
Channel-scale tidal currents from vessel-mounted ADCP in three navigation channels of the Colombian Pacific: phase-dependent vertical structure and its dissociation from stratification

This research, published recently, underscores a critical gap in our understanding of tidal currents within port access channels – a gap that has significant implications for maritime operations, coastal engineering, and broader oceanographic modeling. Traditionally, these currents are assessed using single, bottom-mounted moorings. However, as this study powerfully demonstrates, relying on such localized data in bathymetrically complex channels can be profoundly misleading. The authors’ innovative use of vessel-mounted Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs) across three navigation channels in the Colombian Pacific – Tumaco, Buenaventura, and Málaga bays – provides a far more comprehensive, channel-scale perspective. This approach, while underutilized, offers a valuable alternative to traditional methods, especially when considering the variability of flow along a channel's length. The sheer scale of the data collected—1.48 million profiles and 18.9 million binned observations—is impressive and allows for a robust characterization of these dynamic environments. Related work on estimating bottom friction coefficients, as seen in Estimation and interpretation of spatially varying bottom friction coefficients in Bohai Bay using A-4DEnVar, highlights the importance of accurately modeling these forces in coastal regions, and this study's findings on phase-dependent asymmetry directly inform those efforts.

The key finding regarding phase-dependent vertical structure—where the speed ratio between ebb and flood tides differs significantly between Buenaventura and Málaga compared to Tumaco—is particularly noteworthy. The study’s meticulous approach, utilizing a bottom-following normalized coordinate system to mitigate compositional biases in the data, strengthens the reliability of these observations. Further, the correlation between freshwater flow and stratification, and the observed dissociation between stratification and vertical phase asymmetry, suggest that channel geometry and friction play a more significant role than previously appreciated. The validation of the survey-based observations with a month-long moored record in the Tumaco channel adds further confidence to the study's conclusions. The work connects well with the broader effort to create high-resolution digital twins of vulnerable marine ecosystems, such as demonstrated in A high-resolution digital twin of Oeno Atoll (Pitcairn Islands) through integrated geospatial data. This study highlights the necessity of comprehensive data collection for accurate modeling and management of these systems. The ability to leverage geospatial technologies for ocean floor mapping, as discussed in How Geospatial Technologies are Helping to Complete the Effort to Map the World's Ocean Floor - Geography Realm, is foundational to understanding the complex interplay of physical processes within these channels.

The implications of this research extend beyond the specific locations studied. It reinforces the need for adaptive and spatially resolved monitoring strategies in coastal environments, especially those characterized by complex bathymetry and varying freshwater inputs. The traditional reliance on single-point measurements is simply inadequate for capturing the full complexity of tidal dynamics in many port access channels. This study’s robust methodology—combining vessel-mounted ADCP surveys, CTD profiles, and moored records—provides a blueprint for future investigations seeking to improve our understanding of coastal currents. The authors rightly point out the need for concurrent moored and vessel observations to definitively test the representativeness of single-point data, a critical step towards refining predictive models and informing coastal management decisions.

Looking ahead, a crucial question arises: how can we efficiently scale this type of integrated data collection across other critical coastal regions? The cost and logistical challenges associated with vessel-based surveys remain significant barriers. Developing autonomous platforms, such as gliders or uncrewed surface vessels equipped with ADCPs and CTDs, could offer a more cost-effective means of collecting the high-resolution, channel-scale data needed to accurately characterize tidal currents and their influence on coastal ecosystems and human activities. The convergence of advanced sensor technology, autonomous platforms, and sophisticated data assimilation techniques promises a new era of ocean intelligence, enabling us to better understand and manage our coastal resources.

Tidal currents in port access channels are usually characterized from single bottom-mounted moorings, yet in bathymetrically heterogeneous channels the vertical structure and asymmetry of the flow can vary along the channel, and vessel-mounted surveys remain underused as a channel-scale alternative. Here we characterize the tidal currents of the navigation channels of Tumaco, Buenaventura, and Málaga bays (Colombian Pacific) from vessel-mounted ADCP surveys carried out between 2020 and 2024 (1.48 million profiles, 18.9 million binned observations), CTD profiles with concurrent CTD–ADCP pairs, and a month-long moored record in the Tumaco channel; all vertical-structure metrics are computed in a bottom-following normalized coordinate that avoids the composition bias arising when profiles of different total depth are pooled into absolute-depth bins. The median profile is surface-intensified in the three channels and in both tidal phases, but the phase contrast differs sharply: the lower-third to upper-third speed ratio is phase-independent in the Tumaco channel (Rflood/Rebb = 1.00) and markedly phase-dependent in Buenaventura (1.38) and Málaga (1.45), with ebb shear exceeding flood shear by a factor of 1.77 in both. The bulk velocity distributions of the three channels are ebb-dominant (median ebb-to-flood ratios of 1.18, 1.10, and 1.23), robust to the diurnal sampling imbalance of the surveys. The Buenaventura channel is partially mixed (ηs = 0.328, φ = 61 J m-3, median gradient Richardson number 1.7) whereas the Málaga and Tumaco channels are well mixed (ηs = 0.098 and 0.011), and the freshwater flow ratio computed from measured water-surface areas, tidal prisms, and modelled river discharges reproduces that ordering (0.0052, 0.0187, and 0.0063). The moored record yields a description of its channel qualitatively consistent with the survey-based one. Two channels with opposite mixing regimes therefore display nearly identical vertical phase asymmetry, so stratification alone cannot account for the contrast, pointing to an additional contribution from channel geometry and friction; the balance between freshwater delivery and tidal exchange is instead the plausible driver of the stratification contrast itself. A conclusive test of single-point representativeness would require concurrent moored and vessel observations, which these records do not provide.

Read on the original site

Open the publisher's page for the full experience

View original article